Skip to content

Conversation

@kernelshard
Copy link
Contributor

Pin tblib to ==3.1.0 to ensure consistent traceback serialization across Python versions.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 25, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 78.67%. Comparing base (1ad3bd4) to head (0cf848d).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #9967   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   78.67%   78.67%           
=======================================
  Files         153      153           
  Lines       19304    19304           
  Branches     2212     2212           
=======================================
  Hits        15188    15188           
  Misses       3817     3817           
  Partials      299      299           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 78.65% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@auvipy auvipy added this to the 5.6.0 milestone Oct 25, 2025
@auvipy auvipy merged commit 2f60642 into celery:main Oct 25, 2025
107 checks passed
@@ -1,2 +1 @@
tblib>=1.5.0;python_version>='3.8.0'
tblib>=1.3.0;python_version<'3.8.0'
tblib==3.1.0
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this be tblib>=1.50,<3.2.0? This would allow users of Celery to have versions of tblib in the working version range, that may be used by other libraries of the project? This might force people to upgrade to a version incompatible with other dependencies.

Suggested change
tblib==3.1.0
tblib>=1.50,<3.2.0

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it is better to stick to specific version. why should we try so old version?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants