Skip to content

SMARTS bits#896

Merged
egonw merged 8 commits intomasterfrom
smarts-bits
Sep 10, 2022
Merged

SMARTS bits#896
egonw merged 8 commits intomasterfrom
smarts-bits

Conversation

@johnmay
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@johnmay johnmay commented Sep 10, 2022

Been working on something fun when I was on Holiday which made me realise some updates to the SMARTS/Query APIs would be needed.

@johnmay
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

johnmay commented Sep 10, 2022

Odd passes OK locally

…ferent between unique atoms (more efficient) and unique atom sets and both can be useful. Consider matching OSO against OS(*)(O)O, there are 2 unique matches over the atoms but 3 over the set of atoms (i.e. we see a new combinatation).
@johnmay
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

johnmay commented Sep 10, 2022

Perhaps need to think what is the most sensible default for unique atoms vs unique atom sets.

@johnmay
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

johnmay commented Sep 10, 2022

Odd passes OK locally

They didn't :-)

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 4 Code Smells

43.1% 43.1% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@egonw
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

egonw commented Sep 10, 2022

Looks good to me.

@egonw egonw merged commit a4ca3cb into master Sep 10, 2022
@johnmay
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

johnmay commented Sep 10, 2022

Testing other toolkits I thin I will reverse the Unique filtering naming. Most do consider (0,1,2), (0,1,3) and (2,1,3) to be unique.

@johnmay johnmay deleted the smarts-bits branch October 20, 2024 14:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants