Skip to content

Patch/sgroup improvements#821

Merged
egonw merged 5 commits intomasterfrom
patch/sgroup-improvements
Feb 7, 2022
Merged

Patch/sgroup improvements#821
egonw merged 5 commits intomasterfrom
patch/sgroup-improvements

Conversation

@johnmay
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@johnmay johnmay commented Feb 6, 2022

Fixes #815 and #617

…e reason we used to copy the Sgroup but I don't think this is need since the new logic is either the entire Sgroup is included or ignored.
…); this is useful for a "swap" like operation where we replace one atom with another. We can preserve the Sgroup here but need to update it's storage.
… This can cause stereo and sgroups to become invalid.
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 6, 2022

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 10 Code Smells

0.0% 0.0% Coverage
76.6% 76.6% Duplication

@egonw egonw merged commit a6999bb into master Feb 7, 2022
@egonw
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

egonw commented Feb 7, 2022

Thank you.

@johnmay johnmay deleted the patch/sgroup-improvements branch February 9, 2022 15:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Connectivity checker should partition Sgroups correctly and it can be optimised

2 participants