Skip to content

docs: add sphinx-docs-starter-pack base#185

Closed
cjdcordeiro wants to merge 3 commits intocanonical:mainfrom
cjdcordeiro:ROCKS-1684/sphinx-starter-pack
Closed

docs: add sphinx-docs-starter-pack base#185
cjdcordeiro wants to merge 3 commits intocanonical:mainfrom
cjdcordeiro:ROCKS-1684/sphinx-starter-pack

Conversation

@cjdcordeiro
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Have you signed the CLA?

This PR follows the instructions from https://github.com/canonical/sphinx-docs-starter-pack to add the baseline sphinx-docs-start-pack upon which the coming docs will be based on.

The .sphinx folder is pretty much a boilerplate and should stay in sync with https://github.com/canonical/sphinx-docs-starter-pack.

RTD has already been connected to the Chisel project.

@cjdcordeiro cjdcordeiro requested a review from letFunny December 16, 2024 15:53
@cjdcordeiro
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Note the automatically-built RTD page within the checks -> https://canonical-chisel--185.com.readthedocs.build/en/185/

Rafid Bin Mostofa and others added 3 commits December 16, 2024 17:27
This commit adds a skeleton of the documentation based on docs starter
pack: https://canonical-starter-pack.readthedocs-hosted.com/latest/.

Note that the docs themselves are not updated. Only necessary files and
hacks are introduced in this commit.
Read reuse/substitutions.yaml if it exists into myst_substitutions to
reuse content with simple markdown.

Additionally, delete reuse/links.txt since we are not using
reStructuredText.

This commit also updates a few misc settings in conf.py.
Copy link
Collaborator

@letFunny letFunny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Discussed offline, this is all the code that the starter pack generates automatically.

@cjdcordeiro
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Moving docs to new repo -> github.com/canonical/chisel-docs.

Cloning this PR at canonical/chisel-docs#1

@cjdcordeiro cjdcordeiro closed this Jan 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants