Conversation
🦙 MegaLinter status: ✅ SUCCESS
See detailed report in MegaLinter reports MegaLinter is graciously provided by |
|
@bigludo7 I edited the title and the description of the PR, as the content is a 400, not a 403 error response. |
| value: | ||
| status: 400 | ||
| code: OUT_OF_RANGE | ||
| message: Client specified an invalid range. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a very generic definition. A client which will receive such error code will have to guess what exactly value is out of the range and what this range is. The error must explicitly say this.
If we introduce this error for maxAge > 24000 only - we can describe this in he API description. So, a client knows what the error is really about.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As we have very few attribute in this check request (only the maxAge in 3-legs, maxAge & phoneNumber in the 2-legs scenario) I have no problem to custom our message to SIM_SWAP.MAX_AGE_OUT_OF_RANGE.
@gregory1g @fernandopradocabrillo @QaunainM work for you?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I prefer to stick with the generic one from commonalities artifact. The message is a free text field that can be customized by the implementation. If you feel that it is something critical we can use a message like: "Client specified a value of maxAge outside the defined range"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@fernandopradocabrillo Yes make sense - I've forget our message capability - This seems to me a better approach.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To have in mind for this PR: #184 (reply in thread)
What type of PR is this?
Add one of the following kinds:
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #187
Special notes for reviewers:
Changelog input
Additional documentation
This section can be blank.