Skip to content

Clarification of Device Object usage#55

Merged
tlohmar merged 2 commits intocamaraproject:mainfrom
tlohmar:patch4
Aug 19, 2025
Merged

Clarification of Device Object usage#55
tlohmar merged 2 commits intocamaraproject:mainfrom
tlohmar:patch4

Conversation

@tlohmar
Copy link
Contributor

@tlohmar tlohmar commented Jul 7, 2025

What type of PR is this?

Add one of the following kinds:

  • correction
  • documentation

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR aligns the device object features to commonalities.
It is also adding a recommendation for not supporting IP addresses as device identifier and extending the general documentation with a motivation for supporting MSISDNs as device identifier.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #49

Special notes for reviewers:

Changelog input

Aligning the device object features to commonalities.
Adding a recommendation for not supporting IP addresses as device identifier.
Extending the general documentation with a motivation for supporting MSISDNs as device identifier.

Additional documentation

This section can be blank.

docs

Adding a recommendation for not supporting IP addresses as device identifier.
Extending the general documentation with a motivation for supporting MSISDNs as device identifier.
@tlohmar tlohmar reopened this Jul 22, 2025
@tlohmar
Copy link
Contributor Author

tlohmar commented Jul 22, 2025

Closed by accident.

@tlohmar
Copy link
Contributor Author

tlohmar commented Jul 23, 2025

@hdamker, please check, whether you comments from RC.1 review (PR#34) are addressed.

@tlohmar tlohmar merged commit 8128cb8 into camaraproject:main Aug 19, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Accesses API] Clarify why IP address is omitted from Device object

3 participants