Merged
Conversation
sxzz
approved these changes
Feb 20, 2026
Contributor
sxzz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, could you please resolve conflicts?
Contributor
Author
|
Done 👍 |
sxzz
approved these changes
Feb 25, 2026
commit: |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #135 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 64.64% 66.14% +1.50%
==========================================
Files 6 6
Lines 379 387 +8
Branches 107 109 +2
==========================================
+ Hits 245 256 +11
+ Misses 114 112 -2
+ Partials 20 19 -1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When the number of args passed is more than expected, it is likely to be mistaken the command syntax.
I think it would be good to have an error in this situation.
If I should implement something like
allowUnknownOptions, I would do it.