Feature
It would be useful to me to be able to download wasmtime-c-api from crates.io, instead of from GitHub.
Benefit
I maintain a C library (Tree-sitter) that uses Wasmtime via the C API. Tree-sitter also has Rust bindings. The Tree-sitter Rust crate has a Cargo dependency on both wasmtime and wasmtime-c-api (previous discussion). Right now, those dependencies specify Git revisions, not version numbers, because wasmtime-c-api is not available on crates.io.
It would be useful if those two cargo dependencies could both be expressed in terms of version numbers, as opposed to git/rev dependencies. That way, consumers of tree-sitter would have more flexibility in terms of which versions of wasmtime were compiled into their binaries.
Implementation
It looks like there is automation for publishing various crates to crates.io, in the publish.rs script. I think that wasmtime-c-api could be added to the list of "public crates" which are published whenever a v tag is pushed.
Alternatives
- Don't support this use case of combining C and Rust, since it's uncommon. If a C library depends on wasmtime, and that C library has Rust bindings, that Rust crate should not try to use Cargo to build and link Wasmtime.
- Suggest that such crates should download and compile the wasmtime-c-api programmatically in a custom build script, as opposed to using a Cargo dependency.
- Some other person or organization publish the wasmtime C API to crates.io. Don't do it as part of a Wasmtime workflow.
Feature
It would be useful to me to be able to download
wasmtime-c-apifrom crates.io, instead of from GitHub.Benefit
I maintain a C library (Tree-sitter) that uses Wasmtime via the C API. Tree-sitter also has Rust bindings. The Tree-sitter Rust crate has a Cargo dependency on both
wasmtimeandwasmtime-c-api(previous discussion). Right now, those dependencies specify Git revisions, not version numbers, becausewasmtime-c-apiis not available on crates.io.It would be useful if those two cargo dependencies could both be expressed in terms of version numbers, as opposed to
git/revdependencies. That way, consumers oftree-sitterwould have more flexibility in terms of which versions of wasmtime were compiled into their binaries.Implementation
It looks like there is automation for publishing various crates to crates.io, in the
publish.rsscript. I think thatwasmtime-c-apicould be added to the list of "public crates" which are published whenever avtag is pushed.Alternatives