Ah, thank you! This was my mistake, tried to make it stricter to avoid user error. Do you have any opinion on expanding types vs just making it unknown? I wasn't sure about the better approach here since technically anything could work but some things like a random class could be user error.

Codecov Report

Merging #26 (4d5a183) into main (a1715b2) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #26   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.55%   95.55%           
=======================================
  Files           1        1           
  Lines          45       45           
  Branches        6        6           
=======================================
  Hits           43       43           
  Misses          2        2           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a1715b2...4d5a183. Read the comment docs.

Ah, thank you! This was my mistake, tried to make it stricter to avoid user error. Do you have any opinion on expanding types vs just making it unknown? I wasn't sure about the better approach here since technically anything could work but some things like a random class could be user error.

I like that there's some type safety there, but trying to support every use case people will have without just making it any/unknown is probably futile, since anything that can be stringified should be fair game.

Also thanks for the quick merge & release!