Skip to content

[29.x] finalise v29.1#33271

Merged
glozow merged 5 commits intobitcoin:29.xfrom
fanquake:29_1_more
Sep 3, 2025
Merged

[29.x] finalise v29.1#33271
glozow merged 5 commits intobitcoin:29.xfrom
fanquake:29_1_more

Conversation

@fanquake
Copy link
Member

@fanquake fanquake commented Aug 29, 2025

Remove it in feerate.

Fix it in the other places.

Github-Pull: bitcoin#33236
Rebased-From: 966666d
@fanquake fanquake added this to the 29.1 milestone Aug 29, 2025
@DrahtBot
Copy link
Contributor

DrahtBot commented Aug 29, 2025

The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

Code Coverage & Benchmarks

For details see: https://corecheck.dev/bitcoin/bitcoin/pulls/33271.

Reviews

See the guideline for information on the review process.

Type Reviewers
ACK glozow, willcl-ark

If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update.

@fanquake fanquake changed the title [29.x] rc3 or final [29.x] finalise v29.1 Sep 3, 2025
@fanquake fanquake marked this pull request as ready for review September 3, 2025 13:10
Copy link
Member

@glozow glozow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK 084c95a

Copy link
Member

@willcl-ark willcl-ark left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK 084c95a

This all looks correct to me

@glozow glozow merged commit fd784f2 into bitcoin:29.x Sep 3, 2025
18 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

@stickies-v stickies-v left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK 084c95a

Backport commits aren't clean, but the changes lgtm:

Verified that all backported PRs are listed in release notes (unless they are missing the Github-Pull comment) (except #33011 and #33211 but those are follow-ups to #32604, which is mentioned).

Verified that I have identical manpages.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: it seems we don't have consistent manner of labeling GUI PRs, with a quick grep showing existing approaches like:

  • #<gui-pr>
  • gui#<gui-pr>
  • #gui<gui-pr>
  • bitcoin-core/gui#<gui-pr>

No strong view, but perhaps using gui#<gui-pr> here would make sense, since it probably confuses people not familiar with our dual-repo setup:

### Gui

- gui#864 Crash fix, disconnect numBlocksChanged() signal during shutdown
- gui#868 Replace stray tfm::format to cerr with qWarning

@fanquake fanquake deleted the 29_1_more branch September 3, 2025 14:59
Ystel2001

This comment was marked as off-topic.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants