Skip to content

Conversation

@ismaelsadeeq
Copy link
Member

@ismaelsadeeq ismaelsadeeq commented Aug 19, 2025

This PR adds supports for mini miner to return the package fee rates of the linearized transactions

The first step for #30079

It is motivated by #30079 (comment)

@DrahtBot
Copy link
Contributor

DrahtBot commented Aug 19, 2025

The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

Code Coverage & Benchmarks

For details see: https://corecheck.dev/bitcoin/bitcoin/pulls/33216.

Reviews

See the guideline for information on the review process.

Type Reviewers
Concept ACK murchandamus

If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update.

Conflicts

Reviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:

  • #30079 (Fee Estimation: Ignore all transactions that are CPFP'd by ismaelsadeeq)

If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.

Co-authored-by: willcl-ark <will@256k1.dev>
@ismaelsadeeq ismaelsadeeq force-pushed the 08-2025-mini-miner-return-packages branch from ed6752c to c24b183 Compare September 2, 2025 19:49
@optout21
Copy link
Contributor

optout21 commented Sep 3, 2025

This PR only extends the return data with the package fee rate, but it does not use the new data. Is a follow-up PR available (as draft) where the new data is used?

@ismaelsadeeq
Copy link
Member Author

Yes it is used in #30079

@murchandamus
Copy link
Contributor

Concept ACK

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants