Skip to content

Fix lint-spelling warnings#30500

Merged
fanquake merged 1 commit intobitcoin:masterfrom
l0rinc:paplorinc/codespell
Jul 22, 2024
Merged

Fix lint-spelling warnings#30500
fanquake merged 1 commit intobitcoin:masterfrom
l0rinc:paplorinc/codespell

Conversation

@l0rinc
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@l0rinc l0rinc commented Jul 22, 2024

These warnings were often polluting the CI output, e.g. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30499/checks?check_run_id=27745036545

./test/lint/lint-spelling.py

before the change:

doc/design/libraries.md:100: targetted ==> targeted
doc/developer-notes.md:495: dependant ==> dependent
src/bench/sign_transaction.cpp:49: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in
src/bitcoin-chainstate.cpp:213: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in
src/bitcoin-chainstate.cpp:213: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in
src/coins.cpp:24: viewIn ==> viewing, view in
src/coins.cpp:24: viewIn ==> viewing, view in
src/coins.cpp:29: viewIn ==> viewing, view in
src/coins.cpp:29: viewIn ==> viewing, view in
src/coins.h:44: outIn ==> outing, out in
src/coins.h:44: outIn ==> outing, out in
src/coins.h:45: outIn ==> outing, out in
src/coins.h:45: outIn ==> outing, out in
src/coins.h:215: viewIn ==> viewing, view in
src/coins.h:220: viewIn ==> viewing, view in
src/primitives/transaction.h:37: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in
src/primitives/transaction.h:37: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in
src/protocol.cpp:51: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in
src/protocol.cpp:51: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in
src/protocol.h:497: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in
src/qt/forms/optionsdialog.ui:344: incomin ==> incoming
src/qt/optionsdialog.cpp:445: proxys ==> proxies
src/rpc/mining.cpp:987: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in
src/rpc/mining.cpp:987: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in
src/script/interpreter.h:298: amountIn ==> amounting, amount in
src/script/interpreter.h:298: amountIn ==> amounting, amount in
src/script/interpreter.h:299: amountIn ==> amounting, amount in
src/script/interpreter.h:299: amountIn ==> amounting, amount in
src/script/sigcache.h:70: amountIn ==> amounting, amount in
src/script/sigcache.h:70: amountIn ==> amounting, amount in
src/signet.cpp:144: amountIn ==> amounting, amount in
src/test/fuzz/util/net.cpp:386: occured ==> occurred
src/test/fuzz/util/net.cpp:398: occured ==> occurred
src/util/vecdeque.h:79: deques ==> dequeues
src/util/vecdeque.h:160: deques ==> dequeues
src/util/vecdeque.h:184: deques ==> dequeues
src/util/vecdeque.h:194: deques ==> dequeues
src/validation.cpp:2130: re-declared ==> redeclared
src/validation.h:348: outIn ==> outing, out in
src/validation.h:349: outIn ==> outing, out in
test/functional/wallet_bumpfee.py:851: atleast ==> at least

These warnings were often polluting the CI output, e.g. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30499/checks?check_run_id=27745036545

> ./test/lint/lint-spelling.py

before the change:
```
doc/design/libraries.md:100: targetted ==> targeted
doc/developer-notes.md:495: dependant ==> dependent
src/bench/sign_transaction.cpp:49: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in
src/bitcoin-chainstate.cpp:213: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in
src/bitcoin-chainstate.cpp:213: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in
src/coins.cpp:24: viewIn ==> viewing, view in
src/coins.cpp:24: viewIn ==> viewing, view in
src/coins.cpp:29: viewIn ==> viewing, view in
src/coins.cpp:29: viewIn ==> viewing, view in
src/coins.h:44: outIn ==> outing, out in
src/coins.h:44: outIn ==> outing, out in
src/coins.h:45: outIn ==> outing, out in
src/coins.h:45: outIn ==> outing, out in
src/coins.h:215: viewIn ==> viewing, view in
src/coins.h:220: viewIn ==> viewing, view in
src/primitives/transaction.h:37: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in
src/primitives/transaction.h:37: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in
src/protocol.cpp:51: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in
src/protocol.cpp:51: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in
src/protocol.h:497: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in
src/qt/forms/optionsdialog.ui:344: incomin ==> incoming
src/qt/optionsdialog.cpp:445: proxys ==> proxies
src/rpc/mining.cpp:987: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in
src/rpc/mining.cpp:987: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in
src/script/interpreter.h:298: amountIn ==> amounting, amount in
src/script/interpreter.h:298: amountIn ==> amounting, amount in
src/script/interpreter.h:299: amountIn ==> amounting, amount in
src/script/interpreter.h:299: amountIn ==> amounting, amount in
src/script/sigcache.h:70: amountIn ==> amounting, amount in
src/script/sigcache.h:70: amountIn ==> amounting, amount in
src/signet.cpp:144: amountIn ==> amounting, amount in
src/test/fuzz/util/net.cpp:386: occured ==> occurred
src/test/fuzz/util/net.cpp:398: occured ==> occurred
src/util/vecdeque.h:79: deques ==> dequeues
src/util/vecdeque.h:160: deques ==> dequeues
src/util/vecdeque.h:184: deques ==> dequeues
src/util/vecdeque.h:194: deques ==> dequeues
src/validation.cpp:2130: re-declared ==> redeclared
src/validation.h:348: outIn ==> outing, out in
src/validation.h:349: outIn ==> outing, out in
test/functional/wallet_bumpfee.py:851: atleast ==> at least
```
@DrahtBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

DrahtBot commented Jul 22, 2024

The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

Code Coverage

For detailed information about the code coverage, see the test coverage report.

Reviews

See the guideline for information on the review process.

Type Reviewers
ACK Sjors, josibake

If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update.

@Sjors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Sjors commented Jul 22, 2024

ACK bccfca0

The new lint failure is unrelated, see #30496. Once fixed, you should rebase this to make sure.

@l0rinc
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

l0rinc commented Jul 22, 2024

Thanks for the review @Sjors.

The new lint failure is unrelated, see #30496

Yes, it was the PR that triggered this change

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@josibake josibake left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK bccfca0

Ran the linter locally to verify all of the warnings are now fixed.

@fanquake fanquake merged commit 55e473c into bitcoin:master Jul 22, 2024
@bitcoin bitcoin locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 22, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants