Skip to content

added Cuban EEG dataset from PR #84, renamed from ds_cbm to eeg_cbm#89

Closed
robertoostenveld wants to merge 3 commits intobids-standard:bep006_eegfrom
robertoostenveld:pull84-part1
Closed

added Cuban EEG dataset from PR #84, renamed from ds_cbm to eeg_cbm#89
robertoostenveld wants to merge 3 commits intobids-standard:bep006_eegfrom
robertoostenveld:pull84-part1

Conversation

@robertoostenveld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@robertoostenveld robertoostenveld commented May 26, 2018

No description provided.

@robertoostenveld robertoostenveld mentioned this pull request May 26, 2018
Closed
@robertoostenveld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

robertoostenveld commented May 26, 2018

the bids-validator fails on this dataset. There are three errors, which repeat for all subjects.

	1: Not a valid JSON file. (code: 27 - JSON_INVALID)
		./sub-cbm001/eeg/sub-cbm001_task-protmap_eeg.json
			@ line: 15 character: 27
			Evidence:   "PowerLineFrequency": 60,

	2: First column of the channels file must be named 'name' (code: 71 - CHANNELS_COLUMN_NAME)
		./sub-cbm001/eeg/sub-cbm001_task-protmap_channels.tsv
			@ line: 1
			Evidence: name  unit,type,description,sampling_frequency,low_cutoff,high_cutoff,notch

	3: Third column of the channels file must be named 'units' (code: 73 - CHANNELS_COLUMN_UNITS)
		./sub-cbm001/eeg/sub-cbm001_task-protmap_channels.tsv
			@ line: 1 character: 16
			Evidence: name  unit,type,description,sampling_frequency,low_cutoff,high_cutoff,notch

@robertoostenveld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

robertoostenveld commented May 26, 2018

@CPernet, please checkout my branch robertoostenveld:pull84-part1, make the required changes and send me (i.e. at robertoostenveld) a clean pull request against my branch. I'll merge that into the part1 branch and then merge into bep006_eeg.

@sappelhoff
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

sappelhoff commented Aug 10, 2018

This can be closed as well @robertoostenveld

@sappelhoff sappelhoff mentioned this pull request Dec 6, 2018
Closed
14 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@robertoostenveld @sappelhoff