Skip to content

Conversation

@sdangol
Copy link
Contributor

@sdangol sdangol commented Jan 7, 2026

Summary

This PR adds a small note to highlight that the processPartialResponse method is async for customers who are migrating from BatchProcessorSync to BatchProcessor

Changes

Please provide a summary of what's being changed

  • Added a note about the asynchronous nature of processPartialResponse
image

Please add the issue number below, if no issue is present the PR might get blocked and not be reviewed

Issue number: closes #4760


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

Disclaimer: We value your time and bandwidth. As such, any pull requests created on non-triaged issues might not be successful.

@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added the size/XS PR between 0-9 LOC label Jan 7, 2026
@sdangol sdangol requested a review from dreamorosi January 7, 2026 09:11
@sdangol sdangol self-assigned this Jan 7, 2026
@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jan 7, 2026
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jan 7, 2026

@svozza svozza merged commit 6239b19 into main Jan 7, 2026
49 checks passed
@svozza svozza deleted the docs/batch-processor branch January 7, 2026 10:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation size/XS PR between 0-9 LOC

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Docs: improve documention regarding the change to async when migrating from BatchProcessorSync to BatchProcessor

2 participants