fix(cli): "no stack found in the main cloud assembly"#32839
Conversation
…)" This reverts commit c199378.
aws-cdk-automation
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.
A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request to a comment.
✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.
cdk destroy
aws-cdk-automation
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.
A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request to a comment.
|
If the original PR is re-rolled again, we need a test case for this situation. |
✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #32839 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 81.52% 81.38% -0.15%
==========================================
Files 222 222
Lines 13717 13695 -22
Branches 2417 2412 -5
==========================================
- Hits 11183 11145 -38
- Misses 2254 2271 +17
+ Partials 280 279 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
|
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
|
Comments on closed issues and PRs are hard for our team to see. |
Reverts #32636
It leads to a problem in case of applications where there are no top-level stacks, but only stacks in nested stages: #32836.
Closes #32836.