chore(assertions): remove unnecessary condition for if statement in Template#32028
Merged
mergify[bot] merged 5 commits intoaws:mainfrom Nov 5, 2024
Merged
chore(assertions): remove unnecessary condition for if statement in Template#32028mergify[bot] merged 5 commits intoaws:mainfrom
Template#32028mergify[bot] merged 5 commits intoaws:mainfrom
Conversation
Template in if statement
Template in if statementTemplate
TemplateTemplate
go-to-k
commented
Nov 5, 2024
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('does not throw when given a template with cyclic dependencies if check is skipped', () => { | ||
| test('throws when given a template with cyclic dependencies if skipCyclicalDependenciesCheck is false', () => { |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The tests for the undefined case already exists above this test.
In the case of true, not.toThrow is used, so I didn't summarize with test.each.
kaizencc
approved these changes
Nov 5, 2024
| private constructor(template: { [key: string]: any }, templateParsingOptions: TemplateParsingOptions = {}) { | ||
| this.template = template as TemplateType; | ||
| if (!templateParsingOptions?.skipCyclicalDependenciesCheck ?? true) { | ||
| if (!templateParsingOptions.skipCyclicalDependenciesCheck) { |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Leaving a comment to confirm that skipCyclicalDependenciesCheck is meant to default to false, as is the behavior here.
Collaborator
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
Contributor
|
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
Contributor
|
Comments on closed issues and PRs are hard for our team to see. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reason for this change
The following is the code in the
Templateconstructor in the assertions module:However, since the left operand (
!templateParsingOptions?.skipCyclicalDependenciesCheck) is never undefined (null), the right operand (?? true) should not be needed. And thetemplateParsingOptionsis not optional arg.Description of changes
Description of how you validated changes
A unit test.
Checklist
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license