docs: fix improper JSDoc formatting#31820
Conversation
aws-cdk-automation
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.
A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request to a comment.
|
Exemption request |
sumupitchayan
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, not sure how these comments got past the linter in the first place
✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.
|
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
|
@Mergifyio update |
❌ Mergify doesn't have permission to updateDetailsFor security reasons, Mergify can't update this pull request. Try updating locally. |
|
@mergify update |
❌ Mergify doesn't have permission to updateDetailsFor security reasons, Mergify can't update this pull request. Try updating locally. |
Pull request has been modified.
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
|
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
|
Comments on closed issues and PRs are hard for our team to see. |
Issue # (if applicable)
None
Reason for this change
There are some improper JSDoc formatting.
Description of changes
I have corrected multiple instances of improper JSDoc formatting.
Description of how you validated changes
None
Checklist
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license