fix(ecs): stack name can result in noncompliant capacity provider name#29235
fix(ecs): stack name can result in noncompliant capacity provider name#29235mergify[bot] merged 4 commits intoaws:mainfrom
Conversation
aws-cdk-automation
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.
A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request to a comment.
|
Exemption Request: There is already an integration test for capacity provider. The unit test should suffice here. |
✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.
I added a note for this. 👍🏼 |
gracelu0
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, thanks for contributing!
|
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
|
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
Closes #29151.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license