feat(stepfunctions-tasks): algorithmName validation for SageMakerCreateTrainingJob#26877
Conversation
aws-cdk-automation
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.
A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request to a comment.
|
Exemption Request: |
packages/aws-cdk-lib/aws-stepfunctions-tasks/lib/sagemaker/create-training-job.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
algorithmName Validation for SageMakerCreateTrainingJobalgorithmName validation for SageMakerCreateTrainingJob
✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.
|
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
|
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
Referencing PR #26675, I have added validation for the
algorithmNameparameter inSageMakerCreateTrainingJob.However, it was suggested that changes for validation should be separated. So, I have created this PR.
Docs for
algorithmName:https://docs.aws.amazon.com/sagemaker/latest/APIReference/API_AlgorithmSpecification.html#API_AlgorithmSpecification_Contents
Exemption Request:
This change does not alter the behavior.
I believe the unit test
create-training-job.test.tsthat I have added is sufficient to test this change.By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license