Skip to content

fix(ec2): invalid volume type check for iops#19073

Merged
mergify[bot] merged 3 commits intoaws:masterfrom
hoegertn:hoegertn-invalid-volume-type-check
Feb 28, 2022
Merged

fix(ec2): invalid volume type check for iops#19073
mergify[bot] merged 3 commits intoaws:masterfrom
hoegertn:hoegertn-invalid-volume-type-check

Conversation

@hoegertn
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

IO2 and GP3 volumes can also specify iops


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

@gitpod-io
Copy link
Copy Markdown

gitpod-io bot commented Feb 21, 2022

@github-actions github-actions bot added the @aws-cdk/aws-ec2 Related to Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud label Feb 21, 2022
@hoegertn
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

ping @corymhall

Would you mind looking at this?

@mergify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mergify bot commented Feb 28, 2022

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from master and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildProject89A8053A-LhjRyN9kxr8o
  • Commit ID: 17f864e
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 3f49f02 into aws:master Feb 28, 2022
@mergify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mergify bot commented Feb 28, 2022

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from master and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@hoegertn hoegertn deleted the hoegertn-invalid-volume-type-check branch April 10, 2022 17:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

@aws-cdk/aws-ec2 Related to Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants