Conversation
|
Sphinx 6.1 deprecates edit: it is raised in our tests where we run sphinx with |
|
What is the future of automodapi ? Is it time we retire it in favor of something else that the wider ecosystem uses? If so, then maybe it is ok to ignore the warning. |
|
Where is progress_message even called? I cannot find it here. If it is not our problem, let's ignore. |
There is https://github.com/readthedocs/sphinx-autoapi but I don't know how it compares to automodapi |
I don't remember exactly but it's called in some Sphinx extension I think. The problem is that in our tests we are calling sphinx-build with sphinx-automodapi/sphinx_automodapi/tests/test_cases.py Lines 134 to 140 in 6e476f2 |
|
I ignored that warning in |
|
Might have to put that |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #157 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 89.90% 89.90%
=======================================
Files 27 27
Lines 1139 1139
=======================================
Hits 1024 1024
Misses 115 115 📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
|
Now the Windows job failed... |
|
The warning ignores in setup.cfg are for pytest, not sphinx. |
|
LoL I cannot keep up. Doesn't explain the Windows failure though. |
|
@saimn , does this mean we can remove the changes to |
|
We don't do backports here, so I am just gonna "squash and merge" when CI passes. Thanks! |
|
homebrew complained about the |
|
Thanks, @saimn ! |
While trying to make a release I found a few issues with recent version of tox and sphinx ...