Conversation
7b54953 to
e30e5b4
Compare
3759be6 to
bb72973
Compare
|
I bumped SciPy to 1.6, but looking at PyPI, SciPy v1.7.2 is the minimum version officially supporting py3.10 (https://pypi.org/project/scipy/1.7.2/). I guess we need to bump to SciPy v1.7.2? Edit: numpy 1.23+ means we actually need SciPy 1.8+ |
b25e30c to
eb2ae71
Compare
eb2ae71 to
b25a1f3
Compare
e475d9e to
3327c31
Compare
@pllim, I don't think I have the permissions to address the last point. |
|
If it is possible to update the minimum required |
38334be to
186d842
Compare
|
3.10 is supposed to be supported until April, so if we want to have the option to release a minor version before that (e.g. for Numpy 2.0 in February) this PR should wait. |
186d842 to
3763914
Compare
Signed-off-by: nstarman <nstarman@users.noreply.github.com>
With manual fixes for ruff-identified non-autofixable issues. Co-authored-by: Clément Robert <cr52@protonmail.com> Signed-off-by: nstarman <nstarman@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: nstarman <nstarman@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: nstarman <nstarman@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: nstarman <nstarman@users.noreply.github.com>
9bd5734 to
6fafe89
Compare
pllim
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I like the clean-up but I won't merge yet to give other maintainers a chance to review. Though if you don't hear back from anyone else, we should get this in sooner than later to give downstream a chance to test this via nightly wheel.
Please ping me next week if no one else approves.
Thanks!
|
p.s. Auto merge won't work because the branch protection rules need updating but I cannot do that until after merge. I can override the protection when we have enough approvals. |
mhvk
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great, thanks! Good as is, but if you address the second comment, might as well do the first too.
| distribution:: | ||
|
|
||
| conda create --name apy-1761 python=3.9 # replace 3.9 with desired version | ||
| conda create --name apy-1761 python=3.10 # replace 3.10 with desired version |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If there are any other changes requested, might as well change this to 3.12 so we don't have to repeat it for a while...
docs/units/type_hints.rst
Outdated
|
|
||
| .. doctest-skip:: | ||
|
|
||
| >>> T.Union[Quantity[u.m], None] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do you want to change this one to Quantity[u.m] | None too?
eerovaher
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have just one small remark.
Signed-off-by: nstarman <nstarman@users.noreply.github.com>
488be1b to
fe291df
Compare
eerovaher
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The patch here looks good to me. The commit history is a bit messy, but that could be fixed by squashing.
|
|
Yup yup... 😬 |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
|
Branch protection rules updated. |
v6.1 will be py3.10+.