Refactor: use Settings struct#7665
Merged
zanieb merged 1 commit intoastral-sh:mainfrom Sep 26, 2023
Merged
Conversation
Pass around a `Settings` struct instead of individual members to simplify function signatures and to make it easier to add new settings.
Contributor
PR Check ResultsEcosystem✅ ecosystem check detected no changes. |
Member
|
Thanks @bluthej, welcome to the project! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Pass around a
Settingsstruct instead of individual members to simplify function signatures and to make it easier to add new settings.This PR was suggested in this comment.
Note on the choices
I chose which functions to modify based on which seem most likely to use new settings, but suggestions on my choices are welcome!