[ruff] document RUF100 trailing comment fix behavior
#22479
Merged
+19
−0
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
9d8f047 to
7d1a644
Compare
|
7d1a644 to
d835631
Compare
ruff] document RUF100 trailing comment fix behavior
Member
|
Makes sense. I'm surprised that pylint recognizes nested suppressions like this (without requiring |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Ruff's
--fixforRUF100can inadvertently remove trailing comments (e.g.,pylintormypysuppressions) by interpreting them as descriptions. This PR adds a "Conflict with other linters" section to the rule documentation to clarify this behavior and provide the double-hash (# noqa # pylint) workaround.Fixes
Fixes #20762