[ty] Improve exhaustiveness analysis for type variables with bounds or constraints#21172
Merged
AlexWaygood merged 1 commit intomainfrom Oct 31, 2025
Merged
[ty] Improve exhaustiveness analysis for type variables with bounds or constraints#21172AlexWaygood merged 1 commit intomainfrom
AlexWaygood merged 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
Contributor
Diagnostic diff on typing conformance testsNo changes detected when running ty on typing conformance tests ✅ |
Contributor
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Fixes astral-sh/ty#1456.
This PR backs out the changes made in #21130 and replaces them with a more generalised implementation of exhaustiveness checking for
matches over type variables with upper bounds or constraints. The approach in #21130 works for type variables with an enum upper bound, and could have been adapted to work for type variables with aboolupper bound. But it would not work for a type variable with a union upper bound, because of the fact that we distribute over a union (to create a union of intersections) when adding a union type to an intersection.Instead, the approach this PR takes is to speculatively solve all type variables in the positive part of an intersection to their upper bound/constraints when finally building the intersection. If that speculative intersection simplifies to
Never, so must the original intersection.Test Plan
New mdtests added.