Format docs with ruff formatter#13087
Merged
dhruvmanila merged 10 commits intoastral-sh:mainfrom Aug 26, 2024
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
dhruvmanila
reviewed
Aug 26, 2024
370848f to
11ef36c
Compare
Member
|
Re-running the failed jobs, not sure what happened there |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Now that Ruff provides a formatter, there is no need to rely on Black to check that the docs are formatted correctly in
check_docs_formatted.py. This PR swaps out Black for the Ruff formatter and updates inconsistencies between the two.This PR will be a precursor to another PR (branch), updating the
check_docs_formatted.pyscript to check for pyi files, fixing #11568.Test Plan