[Feature Idea] Add column headers to ruff check --statistics, to avoid ambiguity #13717
Description
This is a question that can be easily answered, but ideally wouldn't have to be asked if there were column headers.
Here is an example output to running ruff check --statistics
$ ruff check --statistics
317 F541 [*] f-string-missing-placeholders
241 F401 [ ] unused-import
112 F841 [*] unused-variable
72 F811 [ ] redefined-while-unused
65 F821 [ ] undefined-name
36 E401 [*] multiple-imports-on-one-line
23 E712 [*] true-false-comparison
19 E711 [*] none-comparison
19 E722 [ ] bare-except
18 E721 [ ] type-comparison
10 F405 [ ] undefined-local-with-import-star-usage
6 E701 [ ] multiple-statements-on-one-line-colon
4 E402 [ ] module-import-not-at-top-of-file
4 F403 [ ] undefined-local-with-import-star
3 E713 [*] not-in-test
3 F522 [*] string-dot-format-extra-named-arguments
2 E731 [*] lambda-assignment
2 F601 [ ] multi-value-repeated-key-literal
2 F632 [*] is-literal
2 F901 [*] raise-not-implemented
1 E741 [ ] ambiguous-variable-name
For anyone new to using ruff, it's not immediately apparent what each column means.
Sure, it's reasonable to assume that the first column is the # of occurrences and that the second column is the rule, but what [*] means is unclear. I think having an explicit header row to denote what each column is would make for a better experience :D