Skip to content

refactor: remove unused old code and reduce clone#1208

Merged
HerringtonDarkholme merged 2 commits intomainfrom
strictness
Jun 9, 2024
Merged

refactor: remove unused old code and reduce clone#1208
HerringtonDarkholme merged 2 commits intomainfrom
strictness

Conversation

@HerringtonDarkholme
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@HerringtonDarkholme HerringtonDarkholme commented Jun 9, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Improvements
    • Enhanced memory efficiency by updating parameter types and return values in various functions.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 9, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Warning

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes in match_tree.rs focus on enhancing memory efficiency and streamlining the code structure. This is achieved by modifying function signatures to use references (&Node<'tree, D>) instead of owning values (Node<'tree, D>), and altering return types to Option<()> for several functions. These adjustments likely improve performance and simplify the overall logic of the code.

Changes

Files Change Summary
crates/core/src/match_tree.rs Updated function signatures to use references instead of owning values and changed return types to Option<()>.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant match_node_non_recursive
    participant match_node_impl
    participant match_leaf_meta_var
    participant Aggregator

    User->>match_node_non_recursive: call with (goal, &candidate, env)
    match_node_non_recursive->>match_node_impl: call with (goal, &candidate, agg)
    match_node_impl->>Aggregator: call match_terminal(&node)
    Aggregator-->>match_node_impl: return Option<()>
    match_node_impl->>match_leaf_meta_var: call with (mv, &candidate, env)
    match_leaf_meta_var-->>match_node_impl: return Option<()>
    match_node_impl-->>match_node_non_recursive: return Option<()>
    match_node_non_recursive-->>User: return Option<()>
Loading

Poem

In the land of code, where bytes do play,
We shift from owning, to borrowing's way.
With Option<()> our paths now align,
Memory's dance, more efficient and fine.
Cheers to the changes, sleek and bright,
A rabbit's delight, in the coder's night. 🐇✨

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Jun 9, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 85.71429% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 73.65%. Comparing base (c4c98e2) to head (e159272).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
crates/core/src/match_tree.rs 85.71% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files 
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1208      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   72.23%   73.65%   +1.42%     
==========================================
  Files          76       76              
  Lines        5301     5196     -105     
==========================================
- Hits         3829     3827       -2     
+ Misses       1472     1369     -103

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@HerringtonDarkholme HerringtonDarkholme added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 9, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit e9bbe0e Jun 9, 2024
@HerringtonDarkholme HerringtonDarkholme deleted the strictness branch June 9, 2024 20:54
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Apr 20, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@HerringtonDarkholme