Skip to content

Use std::optional<> rather than boost::optional<>#7551

Merged
chriseth merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
060-cxx17-std-optional
Oct 28, 2019
Merged

Use std::optional<> rather than boost::optional<>#7551
chriseth merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
060-cxx17-std-optional

Conversation

@christianparpart
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

refs #7259

@christianparpart christianparpart changed the base branch from develop to develop_060 October 18, 2019 11:47
@stackenbotten

This comment has been minimized.

@christianparpart christianparpart force-pushed the 060-cxx17-std-optional branch 5 times, most recently from 3fecd8a to 2e56c6f Compare October 18, 2019 13:29
@erak
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

erak commented Oct 18, 2019

b_osx should be fixed with #7554, which contains #7552.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@erak erak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left a tiny comment. And we need to figure out, why Emscripten fails.

@chriseth
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Why not target the develop branch?

@christianparpart
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Why not target the develop branch?

Sure, I could do that BUT I assumed that due to changing 3rd party library code, it may potentially be a little more risky, and using a new major release gives enough head-room. Should I rebase on top of develop? (I also assumed we're about to release 0.6 rather soon) :)

@erak
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

erak commented Oct 23, 2019

I'd also feel more confident with targeting 0.6.0, which should us give some more time if there any unforseen issues as well.

@christianparpart christianparpart changed the base branch from develop_060 to develop October 28, 2019 10:38
@christianparpart
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Why not target the develop branch?

@chriseth rebased on develop branch now.

@chriseth chriseth merged commit 9719f09 into develop Oct 28, 2019
@chriseth chriseth deleted the 060-cxx17-std-optional branch October 28, 2019 11:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants