Skip to content

Do not warn about 0.5.0 experimental pragma.#3600

Merged
chriseth merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
version050IsAnalysisOnly
Mar 5, 2018
Merged

Do not warn about 0.5.0 experimental pragma.#3600
chriseth merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
version050IsAnalysisOnly

Conversation

@chriseth
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@chriseth chriseth commented Feb 26, 2018

Closes #3576

Depends on #3599.

@chriseth chriseth requested a review from axic February 26, 2018 18:23
Changelog.md Outdated
* Type Checker: Disallow uninitialized storage pointers as experimental 0.5.0 feature.
* Support and recommend using ``emit EventName();`` to call events explicitly.
* Syntax Analyser: Do not warn about experimental features if they do not concern code generation.
* Syntax Analyser: Do not warn about `pragma experimental "v0.5.0"`.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would extend it: "since they do not affect code generation". I know it is stated above, but better to be explicit.

@chriseth chriseth force-pushed the version050IsAnalysisOnly branch from 8560e00 to ef7bcff Compare February 26, 2018 18:35
@chriseth
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Changed.

@axic axic mentioned this pull request Feb 26, 2018
6 tasks
@chriseth chriseth force-pushed the version050IsAnalysisOnly branch 3 times, most recently from 69073f2 to c747d24 Compare March 2, 2018 15:34
Changelog.md Outdated
* Type Checker: Disallow uninitialized storage pointers as experimental 0.5.0 feature.
* Support and recommend using ``emit EventName();`` to call events explicitly.
* Syntax Analyser: Do not warn about experimental features if they do not concern code generation.
* Syntax Analyser: Do not warn about `pragma experimental "v0.5.0"` since it does not affect code generation.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Needs double backticks.

@chriseth chriseth force-pushed the version050IsAnalysisOnly branch from c747d24 to 477571e Compare March 5, 2018 11:14
@chriseth
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

chriseth commented Mar 5, 2018

Updated.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@axic axic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good (obviously we need to merge #3599 first).

@chriseth
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

chriseth commented Mar 5, 2018

No, it's the other way round.

@chriseth chriseth merged commit f190b27 into develop Mar 5, 2018
@axic axic deleted the version050IsAnalysisOnly branch March 6, 2018 11:43
@axic
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

axic commented Mar 6, 2018

No, it's the other way round.

I don't think so, #3599 removed the last non-analysis-only 0.5.0 change.

@chriseth
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

chriseth commented Mar 6, 2018

ah that way! sorry!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants