From #3238 (comment):
How about introducing dot and/or hashmark as part of valid identifiers, such as lt.u256 and lt#u256 would be valid identifiers.
The downside is that currently even for assembly some parts of the Solidity parser are shared and that could cause an issue with dot, since in Solidity it has a different purpose.
From #3238 (comment):
How about introducing dot and/or hashmark as part of valid identifiers, such as
lt.u256andlt#u256would be valid identifiers.The downside is that currently even for assembly some parts of the Solidity parser are shared and that could cause an issue with dot, since in Solidity it has a different purpose.