After uploading 2.2.9 to Debian unstable, the CI runner (which run a test on an _installed_ CUPS instance) started to fail: https://ci.debian.net/packages/c/cups/testing/amd64/ Specifically: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/c/cups/1329969/log.gz The following command is launched: ``` lpadmin -p test-printer0 -E -m raw -v file:///dev/null ``` It spits "incorrect request" and the printer is not created, but reading from the logs didn't allow me to understand why. This only started to fail in 2.2.9; and running `lpadmin` without the `-E` then `cupsenable` seems to work. What has changed?
After uploading 2.2.9 to Debian unstable, the CI runner (which run a test on an installed CUPS instance) started to fail: https://ci.debian.net/packages/c/cups/testing/amd64/
Specifically: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/c/cups/1329969/log.gz
The following command is launched:
It spits "incorrect request" and the printer is not created, but reading from the logs didn't allow me to understand why.
This only started to fail in 2.2.9; and running
lpadminwithout the-Ethencupsenableseems to work.What has changed?