[SPARK-56214][BUILD] Upgrade Netty to 4.2.12.Final#55016
Closed
dongjoon-hyun wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Closed
[SPARK-56214][BUILD] Upgrade Netty to 4.2.12.Final#55016dongjoon-hyun wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Netty to 4.2.12.Final#55016dongjoon-hyun wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
Netty to 4.2.12.FinalNetty to 4.2.12.Final
Member
Author
|
All tests passed. 
|
Member
Author
|
Could you review this PR when you have some time, @HyukjinKwon ? |
Member
Author
|
Could you review this PR, @LuciferYang ? |
Member
Author
|
Thank you so much, @LuciferYang ! Merged to master. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR upgrades
Nettyto 4.2.12.Final.Why are the changes needed?
To bring in the latest bug fixes.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
CI should pass with the existing tests.
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
Generated-by: Claude Code (Claude Opus 4.6)