[Bug] [INFRA/EYE] Failing to configure paths and paths-ignore when providing multiple licenses #10748
Description
Search before asking
- I had searched in the issues and found no similar issues.
Apache SkyWalking Component
License Tools (apache/skywalking-eyes)
What happened
Hi!
I've provided the following configuration expecting two different header patterns to be recognized to the provided set of files (note that both configurations work separately):
header:
- license:
copyright-owner: Company Ltd.
content: |
Copyright [year] [owner]
Licensed under the Apache2.0. See LICENSE file in charm source for details.
paths:
- 'lib/**'
comment: on-failure
- license:
spdx-id: Apache-2.0
copyright-owner: Company Ltd.
content: |
Copyright [year] [owner]
See LICENSE file for licensing details.
paths:
- '**'
paths-ignore:
- 'lib/**'
comment: on-failure
When executing, all files are analysed by each entry.
What you expected to happen
I expected the first license to be applied only to lib/** and the second one for the rest of the files
How to reproduce
- Create a new repository with the following files
.licenserc.yaml
header:
- license:
copyright-owner: Company Ltd.
content: |
Copyright [year] [owner]
Licensed under the Apache2.0. See LICENSE file in charm source for details.
paths:
- 'lib/**'
comment: on-failure
- license:
spdx-id: Apache-2.0
copyright-owner: Company Ltd.
content: |
Copyright [year] [owner]
See LICENSE file for licensing details.
paths:
- '**'
paths-ignore:
- 'lib/**'
comment: on-failure
- Add a
sample.shfile with the following content
# Copyright 2023 Company Ltd.
# See LICENSE file for licensing details.
Add a lib/samplelib.sh file with the following content
# Copyright 2023 Company Ltd.
# Licensed under the Apache2.0. See LICENSE file in charm source for details.
Run license-eye -c .licenserc.yaml header check
Anything else
No response
Are you willing to submit PR?
- Yes I am willing to submit a PR!
Code of Conduct
- I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct