Replies: 3 comments 7 replies
-
|
Top reverse dependencies of
Upgrading to 1.80 just for |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Could be nice, to have a discussion once, about the MSRV policy, so there doesn't need to be a lot of future discussion about it. Something for the Readme, maybe:
Also keep in mind for such a foundational crate like |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
So before the release of version 1.0, does the opendal community currently have a specific MSRV upgrade strategy? For example, the MSRV of the latest version of opendal (only used for 0.x versions) will be several versions ahead of the latest version of rust. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.

Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The current MSRV is 1.75, but when I want to use stabilized
std::sync::LazyLockinstead ofonce_cell::sync::Lazyin #5252 , I need to upgrade MSRV to 1.80.@Xuanwo suggests that it'd be better to start a discussion to gather community feedback before upgrading the MSRV,
so can I upgrade MSRV to 1.80 in the next minor version of opendal core?
Or does anyone need a newer version?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions