Skip to content

feat(rust): avoid downcast method of multiple trait objects in same module conflict #2708

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
chaokunyang merged 4 commits into from
Oct 6, 2025
Merged

feat(rust): avoid downcast method of multiple trait objects in same module conflict #2708

chaokunyang merged 4 commits into from
Oct 6, 2025

Conversation

@chaokunyang
Copy link
Collaborator

@chaokunyang chaokunyang commented Oct 6, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Why?

What does this PR do?

fix multiple trait objects in same module from_any_internal conflict

Related issues

#2691

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

  • Does this PR introduce any public API change?
  • Does this PR introduce any binary protocol compatibility change?

Benchmark

@chaokunyang chaokunyang changed the title fix(rust): fix multiple trait objects from any internal conflict fix(rust): avoid multiple trait objects from any internal conflict Oct 6, 2025
@chaokunyang chaokunyang changed the title fix(rust): avoid multiple trait objects from any internal conflict fix(rust): avoid downcast method of multiple trait objects in same module conflict Oct 6, 2025
@chaokunyang chaokunyang changed the title fix(rust): avoid downcast method of multiple trait objects in same module conflict feat(rust): avoid downcast method of multiple trait objects in same module conflict Oct 6, 2025
@chaokunyang chaokunyang merged commit a7023de into apache:main Oct 6, 2025
55 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@urlyy urlyy urlyy approved these changes

@theweipeng theweipeng Awaiting requested review from theweipeng theweipeng is a code owner

@pandalee99 pandalee99 Awaiting requested review from pandalee99

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@chaokunyang @urlyy