Skip to content

Conversation

@alaahong
Copy link
Member

@alaahong alaahong commented Jun 3, 2025

  1. remove the case no relationship with FastExcel
  2. remove no test case
  3. Provide runnable case for style
    Before the change
image

Post the change
image

1. remove the case no relationship with FastExcel
2. remove no test case
3. Provide runnable case for style
Copy link
Member

@psxjoy psxjoy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@psxjoy psxjoy requested a review from Copilot June 4, 2025 01:16
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This pull request refactors the StyleTest class by removing outdated test cases and providing a runnable test case for verifying Excel style formats.

  • Removed tests unrelated to the style functionality (e.g., FastExcel and old POI tests).
  • Reworked tests to use assertions on cell data and format instead of print statements.
  • Updated file paths to reference test resources and refined the isDate method to return a boolean.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)

fastexcel-test/src/test/java/cn/idev/excel/test/temp/StyleTest.java:33

  • [nitpick] Method name 'poi07Test' is ambiguous and does not clearly convey the purpose of the test. Consider renaming it to something like 'testExcel2007StyleFormats' for better clarity.
public void poi07Test() throws Exception {

fastexcel-test/src/test/java/cn/idev/excel/test/temp/StyleTest.java:58

  • [nitpick] The method name 'poi03Test' does not provide clear insight into what styling behavior is being validated. Renaming it to something more descriptive, such as 'testExcel2003StyleFormats', could improve readability.
public void poi03Test() throws Exception {

@psxjoy psxjoy merged commit ea9a858 into apache:main Jun 4, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants