Re-export modules individually to fix rustdocs #6757
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
|
cc @dadepo |
aprimadi
approved these changes
Jun 24, 2023
andygrove
approved these changes
Jun 26, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #6648
Rationale for this change
When I am trying to use rustdocs to find certain classes it often fails to do so (see #6648 for more details)
What changes are included in this PR?
pub usethe content of submodules rather than just the modules themselvesThis means that rustdoc can now find all the classes directly:
Are these changes tested?
Existing tests
Are there any user-facing changes?
Better rust docs