Skip to content

Conversation

@TheBuilderJR
Copy link
Contributor

@alamb can I get a quick sanity check to see if this is the right direction? FWIW this does fix my test case in #14757. if so can you give me a quick code pointer to where I should put a test? thanks in advance!

@github-actions github-actions bot added logical-expr Logical plan and expressions datasource Changes to the datasource crate labels Mar 16, 2025
@TheBuilderJR TheBuilderJR changed the title [wip] update struct_coercion to support incrementality [wip] update list & struct coercion to support incrementality Mar 17, 2025
}

#[test]
fn test_struct_coercion() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The basic idea looks good -- I think we would need to add some sqllogictests that show what we want to happen in order to evaluate any actual code solution

Sorry for the delay @TheBuilderJR

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 9, 2025

Thank you for your contribution. Unfortunately, this pull request is stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Please remove the stale label or comment or this will be closed in 7 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale PR has not had any activity for some time label Jul 9, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Jul 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

datasource Changes to the datasource crate logical-expr Logical plan and expressions Stale PR has not had any activity for some time

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants