[docs]: added alternative_syntax function for docs
#13140
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
|
@Omega359 Does this seem fine? |
Contributor
|
❤️ I like this! One minor suggestion: I would suggest changing the style of the alternate syntax to match the .with_syntax_example() style |
Contributor
Actually, on a second look, maybe we should just add the sql to the syntax example. Something for another issue, very minor. |
alamb
approved these changes
Oct 28, 2024
Contributor
alamb
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
THank you @jonathanc-n and @Omega359
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #13139 .
Rationale for this change
Added alternative syntax argument for doc functions
What changes are included in this PR?
Are these changes tested?
Are there any user-facing changes?