Skip to content

Improve consistency and documentation on error handling in in UDFs #11618

@edmondop

Description

@edmondop

Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?

When writing a new UDF, a developer needs to decide how to perform error management in functions that return Result, such as return_type and invoke. Looking at the existing codebase it is not obvious what are the error management best practices

Errors in return type

Errors in invoke

In the resize function, there is a check on argument lengths in invoke which is not present in the return_type function

use datafusion_common::{exec_err, internal_datafusion_err, Result, ScalarValue};

The same function also returns exec_err, and internal_datafusion_err

Describe the solution you'd like

As a developers of custom UDF I would like to know:

  • what errors I need to check for and what are already checked by the planner (number of arguments?)
  • what type of errors need to be raised in which conditions

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

No response

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions