I think I would prefer that we add a new with_has_headers and deprecate the old has_headers then once this has percolated through a couple of releases we can potentially repurpose the has_headers to be an accessor.

I think I would prefer that we add a new with_has_headers and deprecate the old has_headers then once this has percolated through a couple of releases we can potentially repurpose the has_headers to be an accessor.我想我更愿意添加一个新的 with_has_headers 并弃用旧的 has_headers ，然后一旦它渗透到几个版本中，我们就可以重新调整 has_headers 的用途成为一个访问者。

I think I would prefer that we add a new with_has_headers and deprecate the old has_headers then once this has percolated through a couple of releases we can potentially repurpose the has_headers to be an accessor.

I think is_has_headers name is better than get_has_headers. Maybe we can now deprecate of it?

Alternative proposal in #4909 PTAL