Skip to content

GH-43314: [CI][Java] Delete arrow-maven-plugins from release script#43313

Merged
danepitkin merged 4 commits intoapache:mainfrom
danepitkin:danepitkin/fix-release-scripts
Jul 17, 2024
Merged

GH-43314: [CI][Java] Delete arrow-maven-plugins from release script#43313
danepitkin merged 4 commits intoapache:mainfrom
danepitkin:danepitkin/fix-release-scripts

Conversation

@danepitkin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@danepitkin danepitkin commented Jul 17, 2024 •
edited
Loading

We missed this when merging Java 8 deprecation.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Jul 17, 2024

Thanks for opening a pull request!

If this is not a minor PR. Could you open an issue for this pull request on GitHub? https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/new/choose

Opening GitHub issues ahead of time contributes to the Openness of the Apache Arrow project.

Then could you also rename the pull request title in the following format?

GH-${GITHUB_ISSUE_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

or

MINOR: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

In the case of PARQUET issues on JIRA the title also supports:

PARQUET-${JIRA_ISSUE_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

See also:

@github-actions github-actions bot added the awaiting review Awaiting review label Jul 17, 2024
@danepitkin danepitkin requested a review from lidavidm as a code owner July 17, 2024 22:13
@danepitkin danepitkin changed the title Try to clear Java's build cache GH-43314: [CI][Java] Delete arrow-maven-plugins from release script Jul 17, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Jul 17, 2024

⚠️ GitHub issue #43314 has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

This was referenced Jul 17, 2024
Closed
Merged
@danepitkin danepitkin merged commit b382156 into apache:main Jul 17, 2024
@danepitkin danepitkin removed the awaiting review Awaiting review label Jul 17, 2024
@danepitkin danepitkin mentioned this pull request Jul 17, 2024
Closed
@conbench-apache-arrow
Copy link
Copy Markdown

conbench-apache-arrow bot commented Jul 18, 2024

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit b382156.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 1 possible false positive for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@assignUser assignUser Awaiting requested review from assignUser assignUser is a code owner

@kou kou Awaiting requested review from kou kou is a code owner

@raulcd raulcd Awaiting requested review from raulcd raulcd is a code owner

@lidavidm lidavidm Awaiting requested review from lidavidm

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@danepitkin