Skip to content

ARROW-16481: [Python] Remove the test usage of legacy dataset#14031

Closed
kshitij12345 wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
kshitij12345:dev/remove-legacy-dataset-fixture-1
Closed

ARROW-16481: [Python] Remove the test usage of legacy dataset#14031
kshitij12345 wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
kshitij12345:dev/remove-legacy-dataset-fixture-1

Conversation

@kshitij12345
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kshitij12345 kshitij12345 commented Sep 2, 2022

Ref: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-16481

Partially removes use of parametrize_legacy_dataset. (will follow-up in other PR if this is correct)

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Sep 2, 2022

Thanks for opening a pull request!

If this is not a minor PR. Could you open an issue for this pull request on JIRA? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW

Opening JIRAs ahead of time contributes to the Openness of the Apache Arrow project.

Then could you also rename pull request title in the following format?

ARROW-${JIRA_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

or

MINOR: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

See also:

@kshitij12345
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

cc: @AlenkaF

@AlenkaF AlenkaF changed the title remove legacy_dataset fixture usages in parquet ARROW-16481: [Python] Remove the test usage of legacy dataset Sep 2, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Sep 2, 2022

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Sep 2, 2022

⚠️ Ticket has not been started in JIRA, please click 'Start Progress'.

@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think we should probably keep those tests until we actually remove the deprecated code path (because as long as we have that code path, it should work).
Now, we should maybe re-evaluate when we actually want to remove this option.

@kshitij12345
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Makes sense. Will close the PR and wait till roadmap on that is clear.

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants