Skip to content

Conversation

@rok
Copy link
Member

@rok rok commented Jan 13, 2022

@github-actions
Copy link

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add tests with valid values.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you mean like these?

I'd like to enable cases like subtract(duration[ms], duration[us]) -> duration[us]. I'll ping when it's done.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, this now covers cases like subtract(duration[ms], duration[us]) -> duration[us].

@rok rok force-pushed the ARROW-14100 branch 3 times, most recently from b6ce245 to 9526cf6 Compare February 2, 2022 17:50
@rok
Copy link
Member Author

rok commented Feb 8, 2022

@pitrou could you also take a look at this and #12215?

@rok
Copy link
Member Author

rok commented Feb 8, 2022

Sorry for the push. Had to rebase.

@pitrou
Copy link
Member

pitrou commented Feb 9, 2022

Ha, there are conflicts again :-)

@rok
Copy link
Member Author

rok commented Feb 9, 2022

Ha, there are conflicts again :-)

It's the overhead price of distributed review chunks :)

@rok
Copy link
Member Author

rok commented Feb 14, 2022

@pitrou this and #12215 should be stable now.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add tests for overflowing inputs?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added. However it seems as it duration is not treated as int64_t here and overflow is not detected?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Never mind. I was using the wrong operator.

@rok rok force-pushed the ARROW-14100 branch 3 times, most recently from a68f285 to f2c4b16 Compare February 16, 2022 11:15
@rok rok requested a review from pitrou February 16, 2022 12:23
Copy link
Member

@pitrou pitrou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, thank you. I'll just wait for the AppVeyor build to run again.

@rok
Copy link
Member Author

rok commented Feb 16, 2022

Thanks for the review @pitrou. The appveyor issue seems related to the substrait parser. Maybe a rebase will help.

@ursabot
Copy link

ursabot commented Feb 16, 2022

Benchmark runs are scheduled for baseline = 1b9e76c and contender = d97640c. d97640c is a master commit associated with this PR. Results will be available as each benchmark for each run completes.
Conbench compare runs links:
[Failed] ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2
[Failed] test-mac-arm
[Failed] ursa-i9-9960x
[Failed] ursa-thinkcentre-m75q
Supported benchmarks:
ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2: Supported benchmark langs: Python. Runs only benchmarks with cloud = True
test-mac-arm: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Python, R
ursa-i9-9960x: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R, JavaScript
ursa-thinkcentre-m75q: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Java

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants