I'm seeing some PRs start to prefer the nested namespace notation. I know clang-tidy prefers it. It is more compact and now that we are on C++ 17 I don't see any reason we shouldn't move everything over.
namespace arrow {
namespace util {
namespace internal {
namespace arrow::util::internal {
Describe the enhancement requested
I'm seeing some PRs start to prefer the nested namespace notation. I know clang-tidy prefers it. It is more compact and now that we are on C++ 17 I don't see any reason we shouldn't move everything over.
Before:
After:
Sub issues:
Component(s)
C++