Multiple Asset Support for Asset Partition #60577
Draft
+38
−2
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Only works if the partitions align, and we don't support rollup. We reuse the boolean evaluator logic. Basically, we can figure out the statuses of each asset dep by evaluating the key log records. This gives us essenitally our statuses dictionary. But should we allow this or ban it?
95a4b13 to
886f226
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
Closes: #59293
What
Support multiple asset dependencies for asset partition
Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.