Skip to content

Conversation

@austinletson
Copy link
Contributor

Restore delegate_to param to GoogleDiscoveryApiHook to allow to specification of a service account for domain-wide delegation when using GoogleDiscoveryApiHook to access Google APIs which support domain-wide delegation but do not have a dedicated hook (such as Workspaces Admin API).

Note that based on the discussion in #9461, the delegate_to param was deprecated in #29088 (and removed in #30748) from many hooks including GoogleDiscoveryApiHook. However, the delegate_to param was not removed from the docstring for the GoogleDiscoveryApiHook constructor.

Update GCP connection docs to reflect delegate_to param in GoogleDiscoveryApiHook usage only when using Google APIs that support domain-wide delegation.


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

Restore delegate_to param to GoogleDiscoveryApiHook to allow to
specification of a service account for domain-wide delegation when using
GoogleDiscoveryApiHook to access Google APIs which support domain-wide
delegation but do not have a dedicated hook (such as Workspaces Admin
API).

Note that based on the discussion in apache#9461, the delegate_to param was
deprecated in apache#29088 (and removed in apache#30748) from many hooks
including GoogleDiscoveryApiHook. However, the delegate_to param was
not removed from the docstring for the GoogleDiscoveryApiHook
constructor.

Update GCP connection docs to reflect delegate_to param in
GoogleDiscoveryApiHook usage only when using Google APIs that support
domain-wide delegation.
@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added area:providers kind:documentation provider:google Google (including GCP) related issues labels Nov 18, 2023
@boring-cyborg
Copy link

boring-cyborg bot commented Nov 18, 2023

Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check our Contribution Guide (https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.rst)
Here are some useful points:

  • Pay attention to the quality of your code (ruff, mypy and type annotations). Our pre-commits will help you with that.
  • In case of a new feature add useful documentation (in docstrings or in docs/ directory). Adding a new operator? Check this short guide Consider adding an example DAG that shows how users should use it.
  • Consider using Breeze environment for testing locally, it's a heavy docker but it ships with a working Airflow and a lot of integrations.
  • Be patient and persistent. It might take some time to get a review or get the final approval from Committers.
  • Please follow ASF Code of Conduct for all communication including (but not limited to) comments on Pull Requests, Mailing list and Slack.
  • Be sure to read the Airflow Coding style.
  • Always keep your Pull Requests rebased, otherwise your build might fail due to changes not related to your commits.
    Apache Airflow is a community-driven project and together we are making it better 🚀.
    In case of doubts contact the developers at:
    Mailing List: dev@airflow.apache.org
    Slack: https://s.apache.org/airflow-slack

@eladkal
Copy link
Contributor

eladkal commented Nov 18, 2023

cc @shahar1 can you please review?

Copy link
Contributor

@shahar1 shahar1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well reasoned, LGTM

@Taragolis Taragolis merged commit f30d5b8 into apache:main Nov 18, 2023
@boring-cyborg
Copy link

boring-cyborg bot commented Nov 18, 2023

Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request! You are invited to check our Issue Tracker for additional contributions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:providers kind:documentation provider:google Google (including GCP) related issues

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants