Skip to content

Conversation

@nathadfield
Copy link
Collaborator

closes: #32093

@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added area:providers provider:google Google (including GCP) related issues labels Jun 23, 2023
@nathadfield nathadfield force-pushed the gcs_to_bq_project_id branch from b3434b2 to 2fe2bb8 Compare June 23, 2023 15:07
Copy link
Member

@hussein-awala hussein-awala left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we have the same problem in different places in this operator, we need to fix them all. In the other GCP operators, we try to get the TI project_id, and we fallback to hook project_id when the TI project_id is None.
And don't forget to add/update the unit tests for all the changes

@eladkal
Copy link
Contributor

eladkal commented Jul 6, 2023

Closed in favor of #32232

@eladkal eladkal closed this Jul 6, 2023
@nathadfield nathadfield deleted the gcs_to_bq_project_id branch August 2, 2023 15:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:providers provider:google Google (including GCP) related issues

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

GCSToBQ operator does not respect project_id in deferrable mode with impersonation chain.

3 participants