Skip to content

Conversation

@VladaZakharova
Copy link
Contributor

@VladaZakharova VladaZakharova commented Jan 31, 2023

Add deferrable mode to GKEStartPodOperator


^ Add meaningful description above

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added provider:cncf-kubernetes Kubernetes (k8s) provider related issues area:providers area:system-tests kind:documentation provider:google Google (including GCP) related issues labels Jan 31, 2023
@VladaZakharova
Copy link
Contributor Author

@potiuk @kaxil
Hi!
Can you please check the changes for the GKEStartPod operator, please? This is the second part of the changes from the original PR. Many thanks!

@VladaZakharova
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @kaxil !
Is there something else that i can improve here in the code?
Thanks!

@VladaZakharova VladaZakharova requested a review from kaxil February 28, 2023 11:43
@VladaZakharova VladaZakharova force-pushed the gke-def-mode branch 2 times, most recently from 1b5ed97 to e9d7f94 Compare March 7, 2023 10:17
@VladaZakharova
Copy link
Contributor Author

VladaZakharova commented Mar 7, 2023

@kaxil @potiuk
Hi! Can you please check my PR?

@VladaZakharova
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kaxil
Please, check the changes so i can merge them to main

@VladaZakharova VladaZakharova requested review from pankajastro and phanikumv and removed request for pankajastro and phanikumv March 23, 2023 09:42
Copy link
Member

@pankajastro pankajastro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. But I see the removable of some public methods from the hook so maybe we needs a warning on that for backwards compatibility?

@VladaZakharova
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pankajastro Could you please review my changes once again? Thanks! :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:providers area:system-tests kind:documentation provider:cncf-kubernetes Kubernetes (k8s) provider related issues provider:google Google (including GCP) related issues

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants